These are my notes from the excellent Applications of Everyday Leadership course from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Introduction
Managers need to resolve conflicts in order to get resolutions that satisfy the underlying interests of both parties in an executable and efficient process.
Mediation
Managers can intervene as mediators, controlling the decision process; this is the preferred approach as the disputants maintain control of the end decision and are more likely to come to a mutually satisfying, committed and thereby effective conclusion.
When mediating, the manager should actuate a content and process strategy, to ensure that both parties perceive fair and objective treatment, for example by ensuring all parties have equal opportunities to present their positions, fostering information sharing to discover common underlying interests.
Arbitration
Mediation alone does not guarantee a resolution, but is effective when combined with the threat of arbitration. In arbitration, the manager makes the decision for parties who fail to resolve the conflict on their own; this approach removes the chance no decision is made, but can force sub-optimal decisions on the parties, as they manager won’t understand the problem as well.
Luckily, a “gentle threat” of moving to arbitration might be enough for people to do their best to find positions satisfying their underlying interests, as they don’t want to lose control of the final decision.
By combining mediation with the possibility of arbitration, managers can resolve conflicts while maintaining team relationships and ensuring parties remain committed to the outcome.
Related
Other Peopleware Pages
- August 26, 2019: Business Strategy
- July 16, 2019: Organisational Culture
- June 22, 2019: Highly Effective Managers
- June 10, 2019: Organisational Design
- January 06, 2019: Performance Management
- January 06, 2019: Decision Making
- October 11, 2018: Psychological Safety
- October 10, 2018: Radical Candor
- October 10, 2018: Objectives and Key Results